Amos 2:4-5 — Amos Addresses Judah

January 23, 2013

The first major section of Amos addresses the nations, including Judah and Israel (Amos 1:3-2:16). The writer begins with Damascus (Syria) in the north, then moves southwest to Philistia. Afterwards, the text moves due north to Tyre and then southwest to Edom. This is followed by Ammon in the north and then Moab south of Ammon.  The movement of the text crisscrosses the landscape of the Levant (or larger Palestine). An imaginary line moves north-southeast-north-southwest-north-south as it slowly encircles Judah and Israel. In effect, when Amos addresses the nations he slowly strangles Yahweh’s people as well.

This encirclement and strangling is not simply for rhetorical effect. In fact, it is apparent from the history of both Judah and Israel that they are not immune to the charges Amos made against the nations. They themselves have pursued violent aggression, engaged in the slave trade, and acted in malice toward their neighbors. They are as guilty as the nations themselves. The indictment of the nations is also an indictment of Israel and Judah.

Nevertheless, Israel and Judah stand in a different relation to Yahweh than the nations. While the nations are accountable to Yahweh because Yahweh is the king of the whole earth, Israel and Judah are Yahweh’s covenant people. They are bound to Yahweh by covenant and accountable to that covenant. They have particular responsibilities and obligations that are not applicable to the nations.

Consequently, when Amos addresses Judah in Amos 2:4-5, the focus is covenantal. The same proverbial structure is used as with the nations (“three transgressions..even four”) and the same consequence is ascribed to their actions (“fire”). The consequence would come to fruition in the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians in 587/6 BCE. The identified sin, however, differs from the previous nations.

The sin of Judah is that

“they have rejected the law of the Lord,

and have not kept his statues,

but their lies have led them astray,

those after which their fathers walked.”

In essence, rather than following the Torah, Judah followed their fathers. The first two lines stand in contrast with the last two lines. They rejected one thing but followed another. In fact, “rejected” may be too weak a translation. Perhaps something like “they spurned the Torah of Yahweh.” They treated it with contempt; they despised it.

The “law” or Torah is the foundational covenant document of Israel. The Torah is not so much a “law” in the sense of a law-code (though there are legal materials in the Torah). Rather, it is “instruction” or guidance; it points the way. In other words, this is the history and path of God’s covenant people. Israel is called to follow that path, that is, to practice the Torah and heed its instruction.  Judah, however, did not. What is more, Judah rejected the Torah as its basic orienting instruction. They chose a different path. They chose the “lies” of their fathers.

What are these “lies”? Many suggest that the lies are actually false gods. “Lead astray” is often used in relation to idolatry (cf. Jeremiah 23:13, 32). The phrase “to walk after” is associated with following false gods in many contexts (cf. Deuteronomy 8:19; Jeremiah 9:12-13; 11:10). It implies a submission to another or at least a sense of following another. They allied themselves with another–someone other than Yahweh. They chose other gods. This entailed choosing a “lie.”

False gods–”lies” (or delusions)–are more than simply the wrong gods. “Lie” is one of the words used to describe idolatry in Scripture. Perhaps they listened to false prophets and embraced their lies in favor of these false gods. In choosing the “lies,” they reoriented their lives according to a different way of life. They chose a different lifestyle. But it is a lie and took them down the path of destruction rather than life.

Humanity is often deceived. We have the ominous ability to deceive ourselves and be deceived by others. Such a deception is the root sin in the Garden. Satan is the great deceiver. We believe lies, especially when believing them is to our own self-interest or plays to our pride. We will believe any lie that permits us to do what we want to do, feel good about ourselves, or plays to our own self-interest.

Amos condemns Judah for following lies and thus calls us to diligence in our pursuit of what is true. Where does our allegiance lie? Whom or what do we follow? This is a question Amos asked the nations and it is a question about which every nationalist might want to think as well.


Malachi 2:10-16 – “Faithlessness” Subverts “Oneness”

July 26, 2012

“Faithless” is the word that dominates this section of Malachi. It occurs five times in Malachi 2:10-16 (10, 11, 14, 15, 16) and only here in Malachi. “Faithless” comes from the root bagad that means to deal with another treacherously. This word characterizes Israel’s covenantal relations and thus epitomizes what is broken in the life of post-exilic Judah.

“One” (‘ehad) is another key word. It is used four times in this brief section–twice in 2:10 and twice in 2:15. The one God makes one community, one family, one marriage. This oneness, a unity in community, is rooted in the oneness of God. Israel, as God’s child, is to exhibit this fundamental unity.

But the intended oneness is marred and subverted by the faithlessness of God’s people.

This answers the question which Malachi’s prophetic word raised for the people.  Malachi (2:13) noted that Judah covers the altar of God with tears and sighs. They bring their sacrifices but there is no joy because God does not accept their offerings.  This allusion reminds us of the previous section in Malachi–two addresses to the priests–which describes how God has rejected the sacrifices of the people.

The people, however, ask, “Why does he not?” Malachi’s answer is two-fold:  (1) faithlessness in their relations with each other whereby they profaned the sanctuary (2:10-11a) and (2) faithlessness in their relations to their spouses (2:11b-12, 14-16). The latter receives the emphasis but it is set against the broad backdrop of the first.

The meaning of “faithless” (bagad) is related to the use of “garment” (beged). The verb is probably related to the noun such that the meaning of the verb has the sense of “garmenting” others or “covering up” others. To “cover up” another is to treat them in ways that reflect inequity; it is to dishonor another through fraud, cheating or swindling. It is a failure to act in good faith with another person. This has application both to the wider community and particularly to marriage. We see the fruit of this in Malachi 3:5 where such faithless acts are listed.

The unity of the community is assumed because Israel has “one Father” and “one God” who created or begat this community. This communal consciousness should be a barrier to treacherous activity toward another community member, but, alas, Malachi complains that “we are faithless to one another” (or, more literally, a man is faithless to his brother). This, in effect, “profanes the covenant of our fathers” and even “profanes the sanctuary” of Yahweh (2:10-11).

Malachi had used this word to describe how the priests had profaned or defiled the sacrifices by their words and actions (1:12). The faithlessness of Judah has dishonored the divine presence (sanctuary) and disrupted the covenant relationship with God. Covenant and sanctuary are at the heart of Israel’s way of life and faithlessness subverts both of them.

Malachi, in this section, focuses attention on a significant post-exilic problem. His attention is squarely set on the faithless act of marrying “the daughter of a foreign god.” Ezra and Nehemiah dealt decisively with this problem in Ezra 9-10 and Nehemiah 13:25-27. The language of Nehemiah parallels Malachi’s accusation. Nehemiah asked, “Shall we then listen to you and do all this great evil and act treacherously against our God by marrying foreign women?” Marriage to a foreign wife was itself an act of faithlessness which violated the covenant between Yahweh and Israel as it opened the covenant community to potential, if not de facto, idolatry.

Malachi does not pass over this pervasive post-exilic problem with just a few words. He confronts Judah with the circumstances of their faithlessness (2:14-16).  In this Malachi makes several claims about marriage within Israel’s covenant community.

  • Yahweh was a witness (as in legal testimony) between “you and the wife of your youth.”
  • “Your wife” is your “companion” (connected!) by “covenant” (cf. Proverbs 2:17; Ezekiel 16:8).
  • Yahweh made them “one” (literally, “did-he-not-make-one?”).
  • Yahweh seeks “godly offspring” (or, literally, “seed”).

These function as four pillars for the meaning of the covenantal relationship between a husband and wife. God is a witness who actively joins the two for the purpose, at least in part, of “godly seed.” Husbands enter into this relationship by a covenantal commitment, and that covenant commitment mirrors God’s own covenantal relationship with Israel. Within the covenant of Israel, God joins men and women who covenant together as marriage partners.

The divine action and presence is highlighted in the text by the use of “one God” and the divine ruach (Spirit). God’s Spirit participates in the union of male and female. As a result, the husband is called upon to “guard” his own spirit (ruach) that he might not treat his wife in a treacherous manner. The text ends with the same admonition:  ”guard (or watch) yourselves in your spirit” (2:15, 16).

What is the faithless act? The context, initiated by 2:11, is the marriage of the “daughter of a foreign god.” The specific act in view, it seems to me, is one where a man divorces his wife and marries another woman who stands outside the covenant of Israel. This man is faithless as he has divorced one to marry another and he marries one whom the covenant denies him.

The commonly known translation “I hate divorce” is not a literal translation of the text as it appears in Hebrew. Translators only get that rendering by emending the standard Hebrew text. The Hebrew actually reads: “because he hates sending away.” The ESV renders this, “For the man who does not love his wife but divorces her…”  The LXX reads similarly, “if you hate your wife and put her away…” This would follow the form of Deuteronomy 24:3. Grammatically, the one who hates is the one who sends away (or divorces). In other words, the “he hates” does not refer to God but to the a member of the covenant community who hates his wife and thus divorces her (sends her away). This translation is supported by others as well (cf. NEB, HCB, NIV [2010, 2011] as well as LXX and Luther’s 1545 Bible). The Vulgate renders it:  ”if you hate, divorce.” All the early English versions until the King James Bible followed the Hebrew text:  ”if thou hatest her, put her away” (Geneva Bible, 1560).

C. John Collins, in Presbyterion (1994, p. 40; and undated version is here), summaries the conclusion in this way (see also David Clyde Jones in JBL, 1990, 683-685):

He tells us what the Lord ¿links of the composite action on the part of some hypothetical member his covenant people, of disliking and consequently divorcing his wife: the resulting “covering the garment with wrongdoing” clearly conveys the Lord’s strong disapproval. He then applies it to all of us who claim a relationship with the Lord: “all of you carefully watch yourselves in your inner man, so that you will not deal treacherously in like manner.” He who is wise will watch for the first stirrings of resentment, which might turn into dislike, and repent of it immediately, lest he deal treacherously with her whom the Lord has given to be a blessing.

Luther himself commented (Minor Prophets, 406, as quoted by Collins):

After all, whoever divorces his wife because he hates her is revealed as a violator, a hurter, a promise-breaker, a violator of his pledge, a man who lacks honesty and honor, one who has not done what he should but what he should not. … This stain covers him like a cloak.

The point is that whoever hates their wife and divorces them covers themselves with “violence.” They have violated the covenant and mistreated the wife of their youth. Divorce is a violent act.

Consequently, twice in 2:14-16 men are called to watch (or guard) themselves in their spirit.  Husbands are to pay attention to the stirrings of their heart–whether it lust, resentment or greed.  Watching these stirrings husbands will hinder the kinds of feelings and emotions that lead to divorce, including hating their wives.

Malachi condemns the sort of divorce that arises from the inner stirrings of a man who seeks another wife and particularly seeks a non-Israelite wife. The problem is not merely social but also internal and syncretistic.

Fundamentally, God, according to Malachi, rejects Israel’s temple offerings because they have treated each other treacherously and because Israel’s sons are divorcing their wives to marry outside the covenant. This violates the oneness of the covenant and provides an opening for idolatry within the post-exilic Israelite community.

God does not receive a faithless community, that is, a community that mistreats each other while at the same time voicing their praise of God. God does not accept those sacrifices.


Zechariah 8:1-17 – God Remembers Jerusalem

March 16, 2012

In December 518 representatives from Bethel came to Judah and asked the leaders whether they should continue their lament fasts over the fall of Jerusalem (Zechariah 7:1-3). Zechariah responded with four distinct oracles (identified by the phrase the “word of the Lord came to me/Zechariah” in7:4, 8; 8:1, 18).

He first questioned their motives for fasting (7:4-7) and then reminded them why Jerusalem had fallen in the first place with an implicit rebuke that they were not much different (7:8-14). They continue to practice injustice just as their fathers. Nevertheless, the word of the Lord comes to Zechariah again (8:1). Though questioning their present motives and interests, Yahweh assures Judah that God loves them and will return to Zion.

This section of Zechariah is structured as a series of five brief oracles and two longer (practically sermonic) ones. The author structures the message with seven uses of an introductory formula: “this is what Yahweh says.”

• “I am jealous for Zion” (8:2)
• “I will return to Zion” and dwell in Jerusalem (8:3)
• Jerusalem will experience peace and rest again (8:4-5)
• Nothing is too difficult to God though it may seem impossible to others (8:6)
• They will be the people of God and God their God (8:7)
• Judah and Israel will be a “blessing” among the nations (8:9-13)
• God will “do good again to Jerusalem” (8:14-17).

The movement in this series is from

• God’s jealous love
• to God’s intent to dwell in Jerusalem
• to God’s intent to renew rest in Jerusalem
• to God’s ability to accomplish his intent
• to God’s renewal of relationship
• to the renewal of God’s mission for Judah and Israel among the nations
• to God’s determination to “do good” to Jerusalem.

The prophet’s message is a reassuring one. God is still passionate about Zion (temple), Jerusalem, Judah and even Israel. God has not forsaken his first love—his firstborn among the nations. God will return to Zion and “dwell in Jerusalem.” Zion will again become a “holy mountain.” The result is that the elderly will rest and watch the children play in the streets of the city. And while this remnant thinks this incredible, it is not beyond God’s power and love.

Yahweh is jealous for Jerusalem, so Yahweh will act and save his people from the nations by returning them to Jerusalem. In this God renews covenant with Israel—again they will be his people and he will be their God. This is the promise God made to their fathers (Exodus 6:7), he accomplished through the tabernacle (Leviticus 26:11-12), and now God will renew that promise for the returning exiles.

This answers the fundamental question of the postexilic community—does God still love us? Will God return to dwell among us? Does God still have a purpose for us? Do the promises of Abraham still apply to us? And the answer is yes, yes, yes and yes!

This renewed covenant entails that God still intents to fulfill the promise to Abraham through Judah and Israel. The land inheritance remains intact (8:12) and the divine intent to bless all nations through Abraham also remains intact (8:13). Though they have been an “object of cursing” among the nations, they will yet—through the salvation of God—become a blessing. This is the language of Genesis 12:2.

Yahweh is not finished with Judah and Israel; the divine promise is not yet fully realized. Israel will yet become a blessing to all the nations that had cursed it. God will reverse the fortunes of Abraham’s descendents. They will inherit the land and become a blessing. God is faithful to his promises.

Though in the recent past God brought disaster and showed no pity on those who acted unjustly and showed no mercy to their neighbors, now God has “determined to do good” to Jerusalem. “Doing good” is a metaphor for benevolent acts of mercy and blessing. It is also language that echoes the promise to the Patriarchs (cf. Genesis 32:9, 12; Deuteronomy 30:5). God will faithfully accomplish his purpose for Israel in the world; God will keep his promise to Abraham.

Embedded within this reassuring message, however, are several key imperatives or homiletical exhortations. Jerusalem and Judah are called to respond to the message and act upon it.

1. “let your hand be strong so that the temple may be built” (8:9, 13)
2. “Do not be afraid” (8:13, 15)
3. “Speak truth to each other” (8:16)
4. “Render true and sound judgment in your courts” (8:16)
5. “Do not plot evil against your neighbor” (8:17)
6. “Do not love to swear falsely” (8:17).

Essentially, Zechariah says: (1) don’t be afraid—rebuild the temple because God loves you and will return to dwell among you, and (2) don’t be afraid—live before God the way your fathers failed to do.

The ethical imperatives relate to social and economic injustices. The courts were the place where the rich and powerful would steal land and livelihood from the poor. They would swear false oaths and implement their plots to take what was not theirs. The remnant is called to live as their fathers failed to live (Zechariah 7:9-10).

But it is important to notice where the imperatives fall. The indicatives—the declaration of God’s love for Jerusalem and God’s determination to dwell among the remnant—precede the imperatives. Israel does not evoke God’s love by their good works, fasting and mourning. Rather, God elects Israel. God determines to redeem Israel and Israel called to respond in gratitude with a life that mirrors God’s own compassion, mercy and faithfulness.

Ethical imperatives are grounded in divine indicatives. We love because God first loved us. Our hope, faith and love are rooted in God’s acts which empower our ability to hope, trust and love.

Believers—even in Scripture (Psalms 44, 77, 89, for example, as well as Malachi 1:1-4)—sometimes doubt the love of God due to their circumstances. God’s electing, redeeming love assures us that we are not forgotten and that God is faithful to covenanted promises. God’s indicative acts of mercy, love and compassion—the declaration of God’s love in the cross of Jesus is the climatic act—ground our confidence and hope. In response we offer our lives in grateful obedience and seek to mirror God’s life in our own lives.

Thanks be to God!


Hungering For the Joy: Lenten Reflections on Joshua 5

March 9, 2010

Text: Joshua 5:19-12

[This is part of a small group series for the Woodmont Hills Church in Nashville, TN, which is prepared in conjunction with Dean Barham's homilies that are based on the Lectionary texts for Lent.]

A new generation had emerged during the wilderness trek. Their parents had refused to enter to the promise land because they were afraid and lacked faith in God’s promises. This new generation, however, had been humbled, tested and refined by their time in the wilderness (Deuteronomy 8:1-5).

This new generation, however, had never been circumcised nor celebrated the Passover throughout their whole time in the wilderness. Though they had been watered and fed by God, though they had seen manna—the bread of heaven—rain daily from the sky, they had not been fully vetted in the covenantal experience. They were Israel, but they had not yet covenanted with God.

The movement from Shittim to Gilgal has changed that. This generation now has its own Exodus experience—they walked across the Jordan on dry ground (Joshua 3). They consecrated themselves, walked by faith and camped at Gilgal. They have their own Moses—Joshua, who has his own “holy ground” experience near Jericho (5:13-15). The ark of the covenant, the mercy and presence of God, secured their passage.

Gilgal, that is what they named the place where they camped. The Hebrew verb galal means to “roll” and their encampment on the west bank of the Jordan was a witness that the Egyptians were wrong. They had mocked and ridiculed Israel for launching out into the desert, but their encampment in the promised land had “rolled away” that disgrace. By the grace and provision of God, they had made it!

They had entered the promised land but they had not yet possessed it. It belonged to them but it was not yet in their hands. They were on the “other side” (of the Jordan) but they did not yet made their home in the land.

Now, in this “no man’s land,” they covenanted with God. The men were circumcised at Gibeath-haaraloth (look that one up!). It was as if they were at Mt. Sinai all over again. God renewed his covenant with his people. They celebrated the Passover for the first time in forty years. They had experienced their own exodus in crossing the Jordan and as covenanted people they celebrated the love of God for his people by observing the Passover. The communal acts of circumcision and Passover were the final acts of the wilderness but the first acts of the promise. It was covenant and feast, a celebration of God’s redemption!

This was a transition moment. The wilderness wandering is over but the promised land is not theirs. But now they were no longer a nomadic people, now they had entered the land in which they would plant crops and live in houses instead of tents. They would no longer depend on manna for their bread but would eat from the produce of the land in which they lived. But the fullness of joy was not yet theirs as they looked at the imposing walls of Jericho and the other walled cities of Canaan. The fullness of the promise was yet future but the goodness of Gilgal was sweet. Israel still lived, at this moment, between the Jordan and Jericho.

The season of Lent is something like that. It is the anticipation of joy but the sweetness of divine presence. It is a season when the covenant people of God learn again the lessons of the wilderness and the joy of the exodus, but also yearn for the fullness of the promised land. It is living between the times—between the baptism of Jesus and his Easter.

Lent is a season to watch our past roll away and become something new. God removes the disgrace of his people and offers a new beginning in a new land. Ritual marks the new beginning—waters of Jordan, covenantal dedication and feast. It is typological of Christian rituals—baptism, Lent and Lord’s Supper. We relive the story of Israel within the story of Jesus.

The promise will come. The joy of dwelling in the land will come and is already here. The disgrace has been removed and the land is coming into their—and our—possession. We no longer live in shame but in hope. This is part of the meaning of Lent.

Discussion Questions

  1. What meaning or significance to do you see in the major events of Israel’s life in this section of Joshua (chapters 3-5)?
  2. Why is circumcision and Passover emphasized here? What do these mean to Israel?
  3. What is the significance of living “between the times” for both Israel and us?
  4. How does this story give you a perspective for living through the season of Lent? How does this text impact your Lenten season?

Hear the Invitation (Lenten Reflections on Isaiah 55)

March 2, 2010

Text: Isaiah 55

Come, listenlook and seek. Those are the main imperatives of Isaiah’s invitation.

The message of Isaiah since chapter 40 has been deliverance. Just as God liberated Israel from Egyptian slavery, so now God is acting to deliver Israel from Babylonian exile. God’s chosen servant has suffered the punishment of the exile (Isaiah 53) and now God renews his covenant with his people. “Do not fear,” Yahweh declares, for Israel will no longer remember its shame because God is their redeemer (Isaiah 54:4-5).

So, the invitation goes out to Israel. Come, listenlook and seek. Hear the invitation!

COME! Three times Yahweh bids “come” (55:1). Whoever is thirsty, come and drink. Whoever is hungry, come and eat. It is Israel’s wilderness experience again. God will provide just as he did when Israel left Egypt. Come, eat and drink what is real rather than settle for the illusions of prosperity, success and comfort in Babylon. Come, enjoy what God gives rather than trusting in what you have accomplished. Come, experience God rather than counting on your own achievements.

LISTEN! Three times Yahweh pleads “listen” (55:2-3). Listen, really listen, to the invitation. Don’t be deceived by what seems good, pleasing and viable. Only what God offers is truly good, delightful and life-giving. Listen to the good news that God offers. What God offers is everlasting, eternal—it is an everlasting covenant or relationship. It is not temporary, fleeting and momentary. It is permanent and unchanging.

LOOK! Twice Yahweh implores “see” (behold, look; 55:4-5). See what? Look to the past. Look to the covenant God made with David. Remember how God made David a witness among the nations, a leader among the peoples. God took a shepherd boy and made him a world power. God can do it again! Look to the future! Israel will call the nations to God and the nations will come to Israel for salvation because God has chosen Israel. The future holds the promise of God. Trust him.

SEEK! Once, but with finality and urgency, Yahweh begs his people to “seek” him (55:6). Pursue God—call on him. Let go—forsake evil. Let go and let God.

This is the message of Lent. Those who practice Lent hear this again and again through their forty days of devoted pursuit. We let go—we let go of stuff, normalcy, comforts, food…whatever discipline we have chosen….in order to pursue God through prayer, meditation, silence, sacred reading, almsgiving…whatever discipline we have chosen…that we might find God.

Isaiah 55 assures us that when we let go and pursue, God finds us. God is near; God is available. Our pursuit is not in vain. God comes in mercy and forgiveness (55:7). We will never comprehend God’s grace nor his purposes, but we can embrace the communion God offers.

The invitation—come, listen, look, and seek—is an effective one. When we respond, God will accomplish his purpose for us. The invitation is not weak but powerful. God’s deliverance and salvation is not in doubt. Israel will leave Babylon in joy and peace. Creation itself will rejoice in what God does and pave the way for Israel’s return. Moreover, the return from exile is an everlasting, eternal sign of God’s faithful commitment to his covenant.

As we pursue Lent—as we let go and seek God—we are assured of the results. God will work among us, in us and through us. God is present to restore, redeem and renew. We “fast,” not for some fleeting achievement or fame, but we “fast” to know God.

Our Lenten season—our trek through the wilderness—ends at Easter. The one who paid the price of our exile is the same one who was raised from the dead. When we seek God, we will walk into a life of peace delivered to us by the death and resurrection of Jesus. This is our Lenten walk and our Easter deliverance.

Discussion Questions:

  1. What does it mean in your life to hear the invitation “Come”? What must you leave in order to go?
  2. What does it mean in your life to hear the invitation “Listen”? What distracts us from hearing the good news?
  3. What does it mean in your life to hear the invitation “See”? What do we “see” and how does it shape our life? Does it often lead you to fear rather than faith?
  4. What does it mean in your life to hear the invitation “Seek”? In what ways are you seeking God in your life? What does that mean in practical terms?
  5. How do you practice “Let go and Let God “ in your life?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 936 other followers

%d bloggers like this: