Lenten Reflection: Luke 4:1-2

February 22, 2013

Only Luke says that Jesus “returned” to the wilderness. Returned? That is something about which I would like to know more.

Perhaps Jesus went into the wilderness to contemplate his future, to reflect on his decision to be baptized, or to decide whether to embrace the mission into which God had called him. The wilderness, perhaps, is where Jesus decided to go into the water and embrace the ministry of the kingdom.

Coming up out of the water, he returns to the wilderness. He goes there to prepare for ministry. But he does not go there as an autonomous act of his will. Rather, he is led there by the Holy Spirit with whom Jesus had been anointed at his baptism.

“Full of the Holy Spirit,” Jesus follows the lead of the Spirit to experience the wilderness.

Jesus re-enacts Israel’s experience. Just as Israel was brought through the water into the wilderness for forty years of testing, so Jesus is led out of the water into the wilderness for forty days of testing. For “forty years in the wilderness” God humbled Israel in order to “test” them that he might “know what was in [their] heart” (Deuteronomy 8:2).

God tested Israel. So, now God, through the prompting of the Holy Spirit, leads Jesus into a period of testing.

Following Jesus into the wilderness during the 40 days of Lent, we, too, open ourselves to a period of testing. It is a time for introspection, devotion and humbling.

The 40 days of Lent are an intentional entrance into the wilderness. Here we have a renewed opportunity to reprioritize our needs, remove our presumptions about God, and evaluate our ambitions in the light of the mission of God.

During Lent we follow Jesus into a time of testing.


R. C. Bell, Divine Dynamics, and the Holy Spirit

February 28, 2012

R. C. Bell (1877-1964) attended the Nashville Bible School from 1896-1901. James A. Harding took Bell with him as a faculty member at the newly founded Potter Bible College in 1901. Later Bell would teach at several different colleges among Churches of Christ and eventually ended up at Abilene Christian College as a beloved teacher.

In 1959, Bell was asked to give a lecture on “A Lifetime Spent in Christian Education” and he used the opportunity to lament the shift among Churches of Christ that distressed him. In his autobiographical article in the 1951 Firm Foundation he had warned that the church needed a new infusion of the kingdom theology of James A. Harding in order “to save [it] from changing divine dynamics to human mechanics” (“Honor to Whom Honor is Due,” Firm Foundation 68 [6 November 1951], 6). Now, in his closing years, describes what is lacking among Churches of Christ in 1959.

The whole speech is available in another post. Below I have excerpted a few significant parts below.

“Especially, [Harding’s] soul-kindling faith in God as a personal Friend matched the wave length of my eager, hungry heart. I caught his contagious enthusiasm for God as a Father who personally identifies himself with each of His own, and for the Holy Spirit as a Comforter who personally resides in and empowers every Christian, slowly enough.  However, [his] conception of Christianity as “a divine-human encounter,” in which immediate spiritual communion between God and man is established and perpetually maintained, gradually, became also my conception of Christianity.

“I also knew that in such vital matters as Christians being crucified to the world and the world’s being crucified to Christians (Gal. 6:14), and as Christians really believing with all their hearts that the Holy Spirit was working personally in them to help their infirmity, to pray unutterable prayers for them, and to make all things work together for their good (Rom. 8:26-28) so that they, ever mindful of the Lord’s presence, might be anxious about nothing, praying in everything, thankful in anything, and possess ‘the peace of God, which passeth all understanding’ (Phil. 4:5-7), the primitive church was not being fully restored. In short, I knew that church of which I was a member was not identical in all things with the church of the New Testament.

“With more and more lived faith, as the years passed and I myself increased in spiritual stature, I taught, first, that the personal presence and conjoint working of the ‘Three-personal God’ (Father and Son and Spirit) in and through cooperating Christians is at the very heart of Christianity; and second that Christianity, primarily, consists, not in what Christians do for Christ, but in what Christ does for Christians.

“When Christians fail to make use of the sanctifying portion of Christianity, as though it were an optional adjunct instead of the built-in essential which it is, they harden into harsh, unloving, unloved, self-sanctifying, unlawful legalists and defeated Pharisees, biting and devouring one another as the Galatians were doing (Gal. 5:13-15). A man’s unchristian self-effort to justify himself no more certainly leads to arrogant self-righteousness than does the same kind of effort to sanctify himself.”


Zechariah 4:1-14 — Two Olive Trees and the Oil of God

February 9, 2012

Awakened from lethargy or deep reflection by the angel who had previously spoken to him (Zechariah 2:3) as if he had been woken from a sleep, the angel directs Zechariah’s attention to a new vision. “What do you see?” asked the angel.

This is Zechariah’s fifth vision. Paired with the fourth vision, these two are the central visions of the series of eight. Both are functionally visions within the temple courts or sanctuary. The visions are a sure word from God that God will accomplish his purposes for Israel and the temple.

Also, the vision is filled with dramatic pauses as Zechariah participates in the vision itself. He questions the angel whose initial responses might be characterized as stalling or, better, drawing out the scene for dramatic effect. “Don’t you know?” the angel asks on two different occasions. These pauses have the literary effect of emphasizing the significance of what is seen.

What did Zechariah see? Though sometimes difficult to discern from some translations, what Zechariah sees is a cylindrical shaft on top of which sat a large bowl.  Seven small bowls are placed on the rim of the large bowl. The rims of the small bowls are pinched together in seven places in order to provide seven wicks on each bowl (as in the picture below, an Israelite lampstand from around 800 BCE). A total of 49 wicks (7 bowls x 7 wicks) would give off an impressive light. The multiple sevens represent a kind of divine perfection. This, then, is not a seven-branched menorah as is often pictured. The Solomonic temple lampstands, unlike the tabernacle (Exodus 25:31-40), were not seven-branched.

Interestingly, such bowls have been found at archeological sites and always at religious sites (cf. R. North, Biblica 51 [1978] 183-205). What is amazing about this lampstand is that it is golden. Both the religious form and the expensive metal indicate the important significance of the lampstand. In light of the temple-building pursued in Zechariah’s visions, it seems likely that this lampstand is intended to represent the one that belongs in the Holy Place of the temple. While Solomon had ten in his temple (1 Kings 7:49), post-exilic Israel only used one (1 Maccabees 1:21).

This lampstand, however,  is not pictured in the temple itself but as standing between two olive trees. Olive trees, of course, produced oil for multiple purposes. These two olive trees produce two streams of golden oil that supply the golden lampstand. Supplied directly from the trees, the oil is practically unlimited and abundant. The lampstand is supplied from the life of the trees themselves.

It is a curious picture and Zechariah wants an explanation. The give-and-take with the angel is somewhat playful–Zechariah, prophet of God, you don’t know what this represents? The angel, at first, only explains the lampstand (6-10). Zechariah will have to press him–twice!–for an explanation of the trees (11-14). The text exhibits dramatic pauses through the questions and a dramatic climax by the need to press again (twice!) for explanation of the trees. The picture, curious though it is, is a dramatic proclamation of God’s work in Israel.

The lampstand announces that the temple will be rebuilt by the power of God’s Spirit. Nothing will prevent this–neither mountains nor despisers. God, who sees the whole earth with his “seven eyes” (cf. 2 Chronicles 16:9), will ensure the completion of the temple.

Two factors hindered the building of the temple–mountains and despisers.  The mountains may be literal as ground is leveled for the building of the temple but it is more like that the mountains represent the nations who scoff at this backwater province’s audacity and seeming self-importance. As the mountains surround Jerusalem, so the hostile nations surround Judah (cf. Ezra 3:3; 4:4-5) . The nations are not impressed. Despisers are probably those within Israel (perhaps even inclusive of the nations as well) who think this temple is a “small” thing (Ezra 3:12; Haggai 2:3). It is unimpressive and has little value. It does not compare with the glory of the Solomonic temple.

But the temple will be rebuilt, and Zerubbabel will measure out is dimensions and lay its final stone. Israel will rejoice and Zechariah will have the assurance that he was truly sent by God to herald the rebuilding of the temple. Neither the nations nor the despisers can stop it.

Yet, how will this happen? By what power or strength will Israel accomplish this task of rebuilding? Yahweh speaks the answer directly to Zechariah: “Not by might or by power, but by my Spirit.” The temple is rebuilt not by human military might or by human ingenuity/strength; it is built by the Spirit of God.

The oil that keeps the lamps burning is the Spirit of God. God is the one who will accomplish this rebuilding, empower Israel for service, and protect them from the nations and the despisers. The oil, the Spirit of God, renews Israel and there is an unlimited supply.

Zechariah is not satisfied; he wants a full explanation. What are these olive trees doing in the scene? The angel identifies them as “the two who are anointed to serve the Lord of all the earth” (4:14). This is the climax of the vision itself.

Who are these anointed? There are at least two viable interpretations. One suggests that the two are Zechariah and Haggai who, by the Spirit of prophecy, continually encourage and empower the rebuilding of the temple. The point is that the lamp burns by the light of the prophetic word. While this vision has certainly emphasized the prophetic role of Zechariah (he is sent by God), there is no indication that Haggai is in view within the text of Zechariah.

Probably, the better understanding is to identify the trees with Joshua the high priest and Zerubbabel the Davidic governor. This is suggested by the fact that visions four (3:1-10) and five (4:1-14) are the center of the chiasm and thus constitute a pair. Paired together, priest and king stand as God’s surety for the temple. These two stand in the heavenly court of God and represent the renewal of Israel’s institutions.

The vision assures Israel that the temple will be rebuilt and God will do it by his Spirit. It also signals the vital role that priest and king will play in the inauguration of restored Israel. And yet the combination of priest and king reminds us of the suffering servant, the Davidic branch who is yet to come (Zechariah 3:8). Joshua and Zerubbabel, priest and king, point beyond themselves to one who will unite the offices as priest-king, the Messiah, because neither fully represents the full reality that God ultimately intends to actualize upon his earth. The Messiah is yet to come.

The vision identifies what empowers the renewal of Israel. When God acts by his Spirit, his purposes will be accomplished. No human can claim any credit and no nation can obstruct. God will anoint, empower and accomplish restoration and redemption. This is the confidence of the children of Abraham, including we who are heirs of the promise of Abraham through faith.

We, as believers, live not by our own power or might, but by the Spirit of God.


Worship in Spirit and in Truth (John 4:24)

February 8, 2012

“God is Spirit, and those who worship God must worship in Spirit and Truth” (John 4:24).

You might not immediately notice but one of the differences between my translation and the traditional one is that I capitalize “Spirit” and “Truth.” I think this is important.

The traditional use of this text is to locate the prepositional phrase in the subjectivity of the worshipper (that is, worship with the right spirit or attitude) and in the objectivity of God’s revealed word (that is, Scripture). This interpretation has a long history and has been particularly stressed in many parts of the Reformed tradition. Churches of Christ have utilized the text in a way consistent with their Reformed (Presbyterian and Scottish dissenter) heritage.

But I think this misses the point of the text in at least two ways.

First, pneuma (spirit), though it appears 24 times in the Gospel of John, never refers to  human attitudes or motivations. Though it is used to describe Jesus’ own personal identity three times (11:33; 13:21; 19:20), seventeen times the term refers without question to the Holy Spirit (1:32,33; 3:5,6,8,34; 7:39; 14:17,26; 15:26; 16:13; 20:22). Of the other four uses of pneuma, three are found in John 4:23-24 and the last one in John 6:63. The last text most likely refers to the Holy Spirit as well since Jesus describes his words as Spirit (but this is disputed).

John’s Gospel has developed a theology of pneuma up to John 4.  Jesus is invested with the Spirit and born-again believers are born of the Spirit (John 1:33,34; 3:5, 34).  The Spirit is something believers and Jesus have in common. When believers worship the Father, they worship “in the Spirit.” God is pneuma. So, the Son, believers and the Father share pneuma. This evidences the communal unity of the Father, Son and believers. We are one through or in the Spirit. As such, the worshipping community of believers–those who have been born of the Spirit–worship the Father “in the Spirit.”

This reading has the further benefit of seeing the “living water” which Jesus offers the Samaritan women (4:10-15) as the well-springs of the Spirit who is given to believers (John 7:37-39). Believers enjoy a living water that arises out of the Spirit who dwells within us and “in” this thirst-quenching water, that is the Spirit, we worship the Father. It is the living water that wells up inside of us to give praise and glory to God. We worship out of the or in the resources of the Holy Spirit. “In the Spirit” is the Spiritual dynamic of worship itself–the Holy Spirit who gives life to worship by the living, personal presence of God by the Spirit.

Second, aletheia (truth), though it appears 55 times in the Gospel of John, never refers to Scripture. Instead, the dominant meaning of truth in John is that of authentic reality The context of John 4 is not truth (biblical) versus falsehood (wrong), but is truth (reality) versus type (shadow). Moses employed types, but Jesus brings truth (John 1:17). The snake was a type of the truth (reality) of Jesus (John 3:14). Israel experienced manna through Moses in the wilderness, but Jesus is the true bread (John 6:32). Examples could be multiplied.

Jesus is the truth; he is the reality. Everything becomes real–eschatologically real–in Jesus. The reality of the future–who Jesus is and what Jesus accomplishes–is the truth.

Or, to put it another way…God tabernacles among us in the flesh. The body of Jesus is the sanctuary of God (John 2:19-21). The question in John 4 is in which temple should people worship. Should we worship in (en, literally “in” and not “on”) the mountain or in Jerusalem. Jesus’s response is that we worship in a new temple–we worship in the sanctuary of God’s presence. Jesus is the truth who is the new temple. True worshippers will worship in the Holy Spirit and in the true temple. We no longer worship in a type or shadow but in the eschatological reality of Jesus who is the Truth of God.

Believers worship in a new temple. The contrast between “in” the  mountain/Jerusalem and “in Spirit and Truth” is a contrast between temples. It does not contrast the physical, external or ritual versus the immaterial, internal or spiritual. Rather, it contrasts the type and fulfillment, the shadow and ultimate reality, the old and new temple. The place of worship is no longer spatially or geographically located. It is located in “Spirit and Truth.”

To worship the Father in Spirit and Truth, then, is to praise the Father in his new temple out of the resources of the Spirit welling up in our hearts. We worship in Spirit as we experience the eschatological reality of God by the gift of his Spirit who indwells us. We worship in Truth as we experience the eschatological reality of God which Jesus revealed and embodied in his own person–the Son has brought the Truth into the world in his own person.

We worship the Father in the Spirit (eschatologically by that empowering presence) and in the Son (the true eschatological temple of God).


The Holy Spirit and Unity in Stone-Campbell Perspective

December 5, 2011

On November 7, 2011, I met with the Stone-Campbell Dialogue in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Interested persons from the Disciples of Christ, Christian Church/Churches of Christ and Churches of Christ met for some dialogue, fellowship and service in the community. This was the sixteenth time the Dialogue has met. It was the second time I had been invited to present a paper as the focus of discussion.

I presented a paper on the role of the Holy Spirit in the praxis of unity drawing upon Stone-Campbell resources in our common history.  The paper is not intended to be a final statement of any sort but rather a tentative discussion starter.

Spirit and Unity Presentation Stone-Campbell Dialogue 2011


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 942 other followers

%d bloggers like this: